| | List |
| Subject: | Re: Fidelity unfair in advertising? |
| Poster: | BrunoRBrunoR@nyc.rr.com |
| Date: | Fri, 23 Mar 2007 09:34:34 -0400 |
| Related Postings: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
Bill Reid wrote:
> BrunoR wrote in message
> news:4602f1d3$0$17187$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
>> Thank you, 704set--and who suggested that Usenet was or is
>> "........................... it currently only serves as an electronic
>> baby-sitter for retards and/or social misfits and/or geriatrics
>> to while away their empty days..."
>
> OK, maybe instead of "only" it should say "largely" or instead
> of "currently" it should say "increasingly"...
>
> But what do they say about the exception that proves the rule?
> What IS the CURRENT ratio here of spam/freaks/defectives versus
> "normals"? People who have systems to beat the lottery need not
> answer...
> ---
> William Ernest Reid
> Post count: 541
You are observant, of course, and I had added YOUR commentary to be
interpreted as a compliment for 704set who often gives valuable input. ;)
|
|