| | List |
| Subject: | Re: Fidelity unfair in advertising? |
| Poster: | BrunoRBrunoR@nyc.rr.com |
| Date: | Thu, 22 Mar 2007 17:15:01 -0400 |
| Related Postings: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
704set wrote:
> "BrunoR" wrote in message
> news:4602e860$0$27015$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
>> ---when they advertise $8 commissions on TV but in reality
>> their commissions may exceed $8 by several multiples ;-).
>>
>> Of course, there is the *fine print* that remains invisible in
>> their ads. (Which part of government is in charge of fair
>> competition? "Buyer beware!"
>
> Here you go.
>
> http://www.nasd.com/RulesRegulation/IssueCenter/Advertising/NASDW_011980
>
> Then go here.
>
> http://www.nasd.com/RegulatoryEnforcement/FileaTip/index.htm
>
> You're welcome!
>
> 704set
Thank you, 704set--and who suggested that Usenet was or is
"........................... it currently only serves as an electronic
baby-sitter for retards and/or social misfits and/or geriatrics
to while away their empty days..."
|
|